Loading...

Response to Reviewers– 10 Simple Rules

You must have submitted your research manuscript to the target journal and the Editor would have sent the manuscript to the peer review desk after the technical phase. Now, what you get back is a set of reviewer’s comments. Responding to reviewers comments on submitted articles is an important task to perform. To tackle with this situation and draft an efficient response to reviewers, what you need to do is follow some simple rules as mentioned below.

Presenting an Overview

The changes have to be acknowledged in the cover letter that will be submitted along with the manuscript. You need to point out if you have conducted any new experiments based on the reviewer’s comments. At the end of the response to reviewers letter, all the changes must be marked.

Reply Politely, Needn’t be harsh

Even if you disagree with the changes requested at the end of the reviewers, you can simply state the reason of your disagreement. It might be the case that that particular portion of the study has not been clearly stated because of which the reviewer is not able to gauge the in-depth meaning of the text. At times, the reviewers are a bit rude; however, this should not accompany with a rude response.

Responding to the comment in a particular manner

Always try for drafting a point by point response to reviewers so that no point is left unanswered and the responses are clear for the reviewers to understand.

Thank the reviewers

Before beginning with your explanation, thank the reviewers for spotting out the point in your manuscript. You need to understand that the reviewers spend ample amount of time not to reject your research paper, rather increase its chances of acceptance by incorporating certain changes.

Use of Typography

You can take help of different color shades or track change option to point out the changes.

Provide “yes” or “no” response

Provide ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ response wherever possible. A well written reviewer’s response is critical in acceptance of your manuscript. Along with the response letter, do not forget to submit your revised manuscript and a clean copy of the same.

Self-publishing a book and its benefits

An author always aspires to pen down his/her thoughts and transform it into a book. However, this aspiration has many hurdles in its path to destination. Basically, the publishing industry comprises varied midway affairs, i.e. the publisher, designer, marketing team, distributor, and PR. However, the authors are opting for the latest publishing methods these days, i.e. self publishing.

Basically, Self-publishing is better in comparison to the traditional mode of book publishing. It enables the authors or writers to publish their work without the involvement of the aforementioned middle persons. Unlike the traditional publishing method, the author controls the whole process starting from finalization of the content, designing the book, pricing, distribution and marketing,as well as its promotion. Either the authors perform these entire tasks themselves or they can hire the service providers to perform certain tasks. Compared to the traditional form of publishing, the author has to bear all the publishing costs, however he/she gains more profit through the self-publishing method.

Self-publishing offers some explicit benefits over the traditional publishing methods. Hence, the authors should think wisely before selecting the appropriate mode.

Prosof Self-Publishing

1. Speedy publication: The timeline of the self-publication can vary from few weeks to few months. E-book publishing is also an innovative self-publishing method, which takes few weeks to complete the publication process. However, the traditional publication method takes nearly one-two years to complete the total cycle of the publication process.

2.Author’s regulation:The self-publishing process is performed totally under the observation of the author of the book. He/she has the complete regulation on the in-duration processes comprising, content planning, text editing, publication-related decisions, and promotion as well as the marketing processes. The publishing-related decisions are related to the book formats, cover design, whether the POD (print-on-demand) service is required or not, etc. This POD is however a hassle-free process.

3. Author’s Copyright: The rights of publishing the book should be given to the author, however, the publisher get it transferred before taking up the publication work. In this manner, the author loses its required credibility. The self-publishing process helps in retaining the right of the authors. It is only transferred to the publisher in case of POD publications.

4. No Stacking of excess Books:The modern e-book publication methods and POD service has decreased the count of books that were stacked for years and years in the publisher’s stockroom. The later service allows the authors to print the books only when the readers have demanded for a printed book. In this manner, the unnecessary printing cost is saved.

Hybrid Journals- Are they double dipping us?

Before introducing what a hybrid journal is, we first need to gauge the research publication models. In the age of advancing research and innovation, enhancing the possibilities of access to research publications is considered important. The access portal is created by the Open access journalsthat have these potentials to make the research articles available to its readers as well as the authors, by levying an article processing charge (APC) on the authors.

What exactly is a hybrid journal ?

There are subscription-based or paywalled journals which offer option for open access on payment of APC. These journals are known as “Hybrid journals”. They offer gold open access publication in the subscription model. These journals are expensive as their fees are high than APC of open access journals. This often leads to double dipping, i.e. the author pays the journal charges for making it open access, and again when the author subscribe to that journal, he/she has to again pay for the subscription charges. In addition to this, these journals often take long to make the article free accessible, at times, months or years. Thus, nowadays, these journals have been declaring a “no double-dipping policy.”

The anti-double dipping policy

The companies like JSTOR, Project MUSE, OAPEN, Delbanco, etc., have formed an alliance named as Anti-double Dipping Alliance . This Alliance was formed in May 2018 in order to tackle with the library double dipping events and also bars the librarians from purchasing same research article more than once.

Free access to research publications  is an essential component of carrying forward the research in the respective fields. The cost levied on the authors also needs to be covered. For achieving this goal, we need to develop a sustainable publication model in order to address the issue of double dipping.


How to publish your thesis?

A thesis is a theoretical expression of any kind of research performed by a researcher or student as part of his degree or experiment. Thesis publication has evolved a long way from its form in hard copy format to online submitted text. Publishing a thesis is definitely a launchpad to prove a hypothesis and an achievement for the researchers.

Thesis publication in online journals results in a vast arena of communication among researchers and students worldwide. Communication is certainly a key to development in the field of science and research that gradually sweeps an aura of optimism and scientific temperament among students.

Thesis publication needs a string of points to be kept in mind by a researcher. A researcher needs to write a proposal that could generate a sense of curiosity among the targeted mass. The proposal should be in the form of a systematic study, a proper order of introduction, literature review, methodology and conclusion. There should be a clear –cut expression of the executed experiment or research. The proposal should be authentic and its true identity needs to be maintained. The very next step should be to proofread the document so as to minimize errors and plagiarism. The process should be followed by a good marketing strategy and a goal oriented approach.

Before proceeding towards the process of publishing your thesis, it is essential to keep few things in mind. All the references studied during the thesis preparation should be provided to the journal for maintaining a transparency about the sources used in the research analysis. It is always better to inform the target journals about your interest in the type of thesis publication, i.e. monograph or article series.

Thesis publication is agonizing and hectic for researchers who are incapable of giving a vent to their proposed experiment in words. It is truly fascinating, if the proposal is galvanized with an intense passion for reaching out to the common mass.

Why should you hire Professional Academic Editing Services?

Often, academic editing is presume to be identical to generic or standard copy editing. However, academic editing involves an in-depth analysis of the content to improvise its logical flow, thereby, emphasizing the core ideas, structural arrangement, and less repetition of words. Academic editors are duty bound to understand the topic to its core and make modifications in the manuscript with an eye to the detail as well as strong linguistic abilities. However, their task is not over yet. They have to do the fundamental tasks, i.e. formatting, referencing, and indexing according to the target journal style guide.

Benefits of Professional Academic Editing

Academic editing servicesAs a researcher or author, at times you must be worried about rejection from the journal editor if your research paper or article is not properly drafted. Herein, the professional academic editing services will prove to a helping aid for you.

  • Academic Editors scrutinize the paper minutely and edit it to create a logical flow in the research presentation for clear apprehension of the readers and other scholars.
  • Academic Editors amend the sentences in terms of grammar, punctuation, typographical errors, and repetitions.
  • Being a subject-matter expert (SME), the academic editors will ensure the proper usage of the terminologies and facts.
  • Even if the manuscript is drafted properly, the academic editors thoroughly cross-check its facts and figures from a reader’s point of view and perform the necessary corrections.
  • Lastly, academic editors also ensure that the your edited manuscript is in accordance with the journal guidelines
  • If followed attentively, academic editors’ edits would surely guide you to draft a better research paper in future.

Hiring Professional academic editing services for your research paper result in a high standard manuscript with an increased rate of acceptance by the target journal editors. In a nutshell, the academic editing professionals understand and modify your research work to bring out the best of it in its written form.

Basic Mistakes by a Researcher in Research Paper Writing

Research paper writing is definitely not easy. We all commit mistakes in some way or the other. Some of them can be corrected during the time of editing or self-editing. But there are some mistakes that should never be done and should be corrected from the very beginning or else they will bring us mountains of trouble later.

Common Mistakes in Research Paper Writing:

  • Lingering papers. There is generally a page limit when we submit our paper to a conference or journal. Several reviewers will dislike the work if the page limit is dishonored. The reason behind it is that reviewers are busy reviewing many papers and they do not want to spend their time in making it fit within the page limit.
  • Proofreading and illegible papers.  A paper should be written well and the author should proofread it before submission.  In some cases, certain unreadable papers look like they were automatically translated by the help of internet. These papers get rejected for sure.
  • Plagiarized content in the paper.  A paper that contains text copied from another paper minimizes your chance of being accepted. The texts in your papers should be written only by your own Research paper writing style. It is easy on the part of a reviewer to detect plagiarism using various plagiarism detection software.
  • Information those are irrelevant. In some papers, we find information that are irrelevant and of least importance.
  • Stating the research problem.  In a research paper, it is very much important to state the problems that are really important and challenging. The Research paper writing style of the author needs to be modified in order to please the reviewer, by giving a brief description to the problem and the solutions derived from the study.
  • Paragraphs should flow lucidly. It is important that all the parts of the research papers are interconnected by a “flow”. Each and every part must feel logically connected to the next parts when the reviewer reads it.

MISTAKES TO BE AVOIDED

While writing a research paper, there are some traps that students or researchers fall into. Some have been listed below:

  1. Dearth of research before choosing a thesis subject.

Sometimes, out of stress, students rush their selection of subject. As a result of which their focus suffers greatly, and a reflection of this comes in their Research paper writing style. The important steps in writing a successful research statement is first doing a good research and choosing an appropriate subject that they can well connect to. Doing this will ultimately gift you a successful paper.

  1. Dearth of a strong thesis statement.

The next step is creating a strong thesis statement. Importance of research paper writing a clear and focused research statement needs to be understood by the author.. It should be based on a topic that grounds further discussion.

  1. Unable to make proper connections between the research statement and supporting statements.

The structure of a research paper flows from the research statement followed by the supporting statements, which account the body.

  1. Dearth of strong, relevant data.

All supporting statements in a paper should be corroborated by relevant sources which prove the point of view put by the research statement. Your supporting statements should plump out your original thesis statement and have a strong basis.

From the above discussed points, it is clear that research paper writing can be simplified to some extent if we are wise enough. Keeping these points in mind we should proceed towards our research writing. The huddles will definitely be minimized and we can get a successful research work at the end.

How to Write a Review Paper?

Writing a review article is a valuable piece for those who search for summary of various research studies without spending time to find results by themselves. Writing a good review paper always provides its readers with unbiased information. It provides its reader with a clear justification of why the study is valid or not valid.

Objectives of a review article must be to achieve an organization and combination of previous works around the chosen field to speed-up the assimilation of recent knowledge into the existing one. A review article must me clear and accurate. It should also have a good standard of writing.

Let us discuss about some tips on how to write a review paper.

Review PaperReview papers are not original studies and it just assimilates the study outcomes of the studies. A meta-analysis is a type of quantitative review. It collects data from various other studies to conclude its subject. An ideal review always focuses on a theme. The narrative review article is easy to read and understand whereas the systematic review is a detailed literature survey that is done on a selected topic.

Preparation of manuscript is another major part of writing a review article. The length of the journal always varies depending upon the guidelines provided by the author. The most common guideline which almost all journals ask is a specific font and size to be used. The article structure should have a defined structure. The title page must contain a main title. The title length must not be a lengthy one and must be short, precise and crisp. The title should contain the key elements of the subject matter. The length of the abstract should be between 200-250 words and there should be no citations in the abstract. The introduction part should be a discussion of the subject matter and should also address the objective of conducting the review. It is better if it is written in the present tense. The conclusion part must discuss the objective that is discussed in the introduction.

Here are some of the suggestions on how to write a review article. These tips may help you in polishing your writing while writing a review paper.

Understanding the Background of Academic Editing Services

Academic editing, as the name suggests, is not only for the academicians for also for students, institutes, and scientists. Academic editing services does much more than just language editing, in which the contextual flow of the manuscript is maintained and also the logic is strengthened. To gain international accreditation, a research document must meet the international requirements.

Who is an Academic Editor?

Academic editing servicesAcademic editors are highly trained professionals and are highly vetted for their English language editing expertise. They can work on manuscripts belonging to a wide range of subject areas. They understand the idiosyncrasies of academic language. The minimum qualification of an editor is usually a Master’s degree or a PhD in the required subject field.

How academic editing services assist you?

There are 3 major issues detected in academic writing that can be noted as follows:

-Improper presentation of thoughts: Any thesis or research work that is not presented properly, lacks consistency, has lengthy abstract section, non-confirmation to guidelines, incorrect referencing, and so on, can lead to a negative feedback on the research writing, even if the experimental ground is strong.

Academic writing revolves around the clarity of the message that needs to be well presented, so that it can be well understood by the readers.

– Expression: Many research documents have grammatical mistakes throughout, thus resulting in clumsy sentence structures and incorrect tone.

Academic editors are well equipped with skills to spot these errors in your manuscript. When we engage an academic editor, he/she adds sense to the research writing by ensuring proper contextual flow, correct usage of grammar, correct tone, and well presentation of research thoughts. They understand the evidence-based facts, the argumentative statements and the analysis done in the research to prove the stated hypothesis.

The academic writing service brings out the best in your writing by transforming your words into perfection.

All You Need To Know About Manuscript Editing Service

Manuscript editing service is a sort of professional service that aims at making the research draft error free and appealing to the peer reviewers and journal editors. So that they give a green signal to the manuscript at earliest with few or no suggestive changes.

Manuscript Editing ServicesIn such a professional editing service, the subject experts handle the manuscript who have years of experience in the field of study. The native English speakers are hired for editing in English language in a more professional manner. The manuscripts undergoes several round of reviews even if it is edited by an editor before the manuscript is delivered to the journal editor or peer reviewers. Through this, the confidentiality of the author’s work is also maintained and considered as a high priority. ..

What the subject experts really do in manuscript editing service?

  • They correct your grammatical errors and spelling mistakes in the manuscript.
  • They check your tenses and conjunctions.
  • They certify or verify your references.
  • They rewrite or rephrase the texts wherever necessary.
  • They checks the usage of US or UK English and ensures consistency.
  • They replace poor words with better subject specific word choice.
  • All the changes incorporated into the manuscript are done using track changes or highlights. This enables the authors to spot the changes easily and also re-comment on it if they do not agree with the changes.
  • They also maintain the style and consistency.
  • Enhancement of the content is also carried out by the experts.
  • The manuscript is also checked for content’s logical flow, technical accuracy of terminologies, and use of abbreviations. Its declaration at the first instance, and final presentation of the paper.
  • The paper’s structure is checked, i.e. the pattern they follow (for e.g., IMRaD-Introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion).

Manuscript submitted for availing such professional editing services is inspected by highly experienced subject experts, those who leave no stone un turned for making your manuscript publication ready. Their expertise not only optimizes the content but also the language.

WITHDRAWAL OF RESEARCH PAPER AFTER SUBMISSION: A BASIC GUIDELINE

Withdrawal of a research paper after submission but before publication and during peer-review or even after acceptance is an uncommon event and not considered as a good scientific practice. Before withdrawing a paper, it should be considered that reviewers and editors have already invested significant time in finalizing of the manuscript.

Once the manuscript submission process is completed, the next step, i.e. initial review of the paper by the Editor followed by peer-review by the invited experts begins. During these steps, the researcher should wait for the final decision. However, in some cases, one may want to withdraw the manuscript. For instance, you may want to revise or add important points or may want to correct some errors which are discovered after manuscript submission. In these case, the manuscript needs to be withdrawn much before the peer-review process starts.

Another common reason to withdraw your manuscript is that authors discover or suspect a glaring error, possibly while checking the proofs. This error may require performing some experiments again or removing existing data set. It may call for doing some supplementary analysis. This may lead to additional work, but it can help the researchers to avoid any future retractions. If the authors do not want to make all research data available for commercial reasons or copyright or when they realize that they have made manuscript submission to a potentially predatory journal, here also authors can withdraw their paper. There are unethical reasons for withdrawal of a paper like being unaware of the publication fees or just wanting to submit one’s manuscript to a higher impact journal.

Another reason for withdrawal of research paper is impatience with peer review process. This process is not a black or white issue. However, there are journals who take a long waiting time for completion of the peer review process. Some complete it within 1-3 months, whereas some take 4-6 months. Even if this is the case, the time period of peer review is mentioned in most of the journal websites. Thus, retraction based on the time period can be unreasonable at times.

In particular, after acceptance of manuscript when the journal and referees have behaved blamelessly, as an author it is hard to justify unilaterally withdrawing the paper. When the paper is submitted, the writer implicitly agrees to publish it there if accepted. A submitted manuscript is a request for publication and not a request for the option to publish. It is not ethical to withdraw a research paper which has been accepted. In the publication process journals, reviewers and editors have spent time. To withdraw a manuscript after it has entered this process is a waste of their time. However, the legal ramifications of this behaviour are probably limited.